级别: 保留
头衔: 保留
魅力:
经验:
现金: 第一城币
点数: 信用点
注册日期:
|
消息
查看
搜索
好友
邮件
引用
回复
编辑
删除
RE:麓贸录脪露录掳庐脦脪掳潞
I'd like to send this parcel to <a href= http://streamernews.tv/2015/06/page/4/ >book cheap guest levitra misty org site</a> Bottom line the guy was in his own house in his own room alone and was merely suspected of having pointed a gun at two people (for reasons unknown–but possibly in self defense). That doesn’t merit a death sentence. Not responding to SWAT team orders (particularly when one is “close to deaf in both ears”) also doesn’t merit a death sentence. The SWAT team had no exigent circumstances to enter the home, no warrant, and plenty of options that did not involve the use of lethal force. That force began with the use of a “distraction device”–as stun grenades can injure, maim, and kill. So although SWAT would like to claim that the man initiated by opening fire, the truth is that SWAT initiated by trying to breach and unlawfully enter a man’s home.
请勿任意转载、使用本论坛中出现的文字及图片资料!
第24248楼
|